Sacd vs vinyl. It’s appalling the crap they’re releasing to kids these days…As noted in my previous post [link], the Forum didn’t want to pay the $. Sacd vs vinyl

 
 It’s appalling the crap they’re releasing to kids these days…As noted in my previous post [link], the Forum didn’t want to pay the $Sacd vs vinyl  Inner ear, May 11, 2017 #5

Hard to say which sounds better, but they both sound very hard to top. some of the older quadrophonic recordings now being reissued), or are pieces which were designed for surround sound (e. Even an SACD only disk that’s just a SACD copy of the same CD master is not likely going to deliver a whole lot. Rolling Stone ranked them No. Disagree. jmtd. Midrange is sweet. Madman Across the Water SACD vs CD vs LP. It's very difficult to set up a direct A/B comparison between SACD and CD. Details;The 777ES’s performance improved gradually during a burn-in period of three weeks. I think my buying strategy just morphed into buying a few LPs which I really want and then stocking up on the less expensive SACDs, particularly if the. I like SACD as a format, but it's kind of pointless for me when nothing I listen to is on it, and the few things that may peak my interest (i. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. Well, I've been thinking of getting into vinyl for a while now but still haven't done it. SACD vs. Blows them all away with more full body richness. Most are remasters of jazz, blues, classical or classic rock/pop titles. The presence of the CD layer shouldn't affect at all (at least in principle) the reading of the SACD layer. When it comes to listening to music, there are two main formats that audiophiles swear by: SACD players and vinyl. Denon - DCD-A110 SACD/CD Player. I have most of the recordings you mention and they're all great. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me. The dynamic range of vinyl is about 75dB, CD is 96dB, SACD is 120dB, and the human ear picks up 130dB. The thing that I found most interesting when reviewing the first-time LP record pressing of George Harrison’s 1992 live album — called simply Live In Japan — was not the high quality, dark black, perfectly. It is now showing as ‘in stock’ on the Acoustic Sounds. I am not sure if it is a great. My reluctance in getting a transport has many reasons, the main being my investment in vinyl, but I did need to find a link to my CDs. It ain't dead to me at all, thanks in no small part to our host. I did the comparison via my Stax Lambda Pro headphone system (which can be quite revealing). Nirvana MTV Unplugged In New York (25th Anniv) (2019 Vinyl DGC B0029512-01) Nirvana MTV Unplugged In New York (Vinyl HR 180G) Paul. Even on masterings I'm not all that happy with, the deep soundstage is there. Then I bought the new SACD version. One is the MFSL version which I loved. There are also the hybrid SACD discs from AP but I am not as familiar with those. I've noticed a surfeit in the cost and availability of SACD's - prices are really cheap for some top notch music, often recorded in Europe with the cost for many disks below $12- with shipping no less! I'm in the process of digitizing my vinyl along with ripping hundreds of CD's to my Mac, but I also like playing. So, Changes CD is DR 12 and Changes SACD is DR 11. g. For comparison of the 2022 SACD and vinyl: I have to do it again with all releases. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. It might not bother some people though. But I don't have an LP with the exact same mastering as an SACD so I can't do any type of apples-to-apples comparison (and even then equipment comes in to play). Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. I would rank each. This is really about "The Downward Spiral" re-release. #3. Location: West Hollywood, CA and Inverness, IL. So, out of sheer desperation, I ordered the standard US CD from Amazon. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. is the world leader in audiophile music. With a storage capacity of 4. SACD VS Vinyl for Jazz and Classical Well, I've been thinking of getting into vinyl for a while now but still haven't done it. I don't like SACD. Even as a purist I am very happy with the results. It plays PCM and may not do high res. 10/disc royalty for CDs. After an extensive shoot-out lasting 53 hours, I'm. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. 112 posts total. I think there's some digital filtering. . It was mastered by Bob Ludwig in December 2002. "No matter how high a sampling rate is," Wired's. Singles 1969-1973 has a re-record or two, a little remixing, and other touches. #13. #30. Maybe but so far my experience with mofi's SACD vs vinyl has not been good for SACS. One is the MFSL version which I loved. #1. The category "Outstanding" doesn't mean audiophile sound, but outstanding quality compared to original pressings. I want the best sound. Head Gear. Multi-Channel Audio: SACDs often feature multi-channel audio, allowing for surround sound experiences. the HDCD, the single-layer SACD, the MFSL SACD and vinyl, the Audio Fidelity vinyl, and the RSD candy-colored 150-numbered-limited pressing. I have a feeling the vinyl will sound better. 1kHz/16-bit digital audio is indistinguishable from high-resolution digital. I find that SACD offers more detail and a deeper, wider soundstage and better instrument timbre over CD. On the vinyl, the violin and the acoustic rhythm guitar lay back a bit, and there's a slightly rounded-off, woody tone to the drumming and the bass, and a very, very subtle tunneled, recessed quality to the vocals. Gooey black bag houses an extremely high quality record sleeve with postcards, posters, 320 kbps MP3 download and sturdy inner sleeve and a very nice vinyl record in a plastic sleeve. Search first posts only. 98: Whitney Houston / Whitney. Audiogon The world's largest high-end audio community. 45 RPM 200 Gram Clarity Vinyl. Certainly better than 3 or 4 other vinyl versions I have owned over the years. CDs are a digital music storage medium, meaning the music is encoded as binary data. The separation between the left and right channels on vinyl is 30dB, compared to digital files, which exceed 90 dB. I'm generally rather selective about my SACD purchases and onl. The "Mastertape" version though more detailed and seemingly purer sounds flatter in eq. I no longer have the capability of playing vinyl. Maybe no better overall than any other version. 1 kHz and 16 bits of information per sample. I may have to compare the SHM-SACD or other CD versions to this SACD to see if it improves at all on those. although DVD-Audio does sound great too. SACD has a higher bit rate and uses a different encoding method from Vinyl to capture and reproduce more audio information. The curve below compares the spectra of vinyl and SACD. . shadorne. Vinyl is an analog storage medium, which means there is a physical record of the music imprinted. Yesterday I received a Holiday Specials brochure from Music Direct and on the back cover is the 2LP vinyl set that Ralphie discussed in his post HERE. however you need to be extra careful as there are many SACDs where the MultiCh content is not only distinct in being a different mix but a different mastering from the Stereo and that Stereo version can often just be a recycling of the current CD remaster the label had at the. Virtual. The data is read by a laser, and then decoded to produce audio playback. But in the last month I have finally picked up an SACD player and I was looking to pick up the SACD of Dark Side, in fact I had started to price them when I saw this. Every time. And I'm not all that hot on CDs. Boy, what a difference. I don't know which is more truthful. I no longer have the capability of playing vinyl. Vinyl. I like both; but am buying more hi-q vinyl than SACD, DVD-A, or HDCD simply because remastered 180g vinyl is easier to find in the genres I listen to: Rock, alt. DANKOSKY: We'll be talking a bit about some of these new, modern ways of compressing music. On the other hand digital has advantages in terms of low noise, low distortion etc so if you value that more, go for the SACD. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. Then I bought the new SACD version. 1 option. The discs are digitally identical and will sound exactly the same no matter what some snake oil lovers will tell you. My buddy and I compared Tidal's "Moving Pictures" to the vinyl reissue. Smoother, more open, and slightly fuller than redbook, without the added distortion of vinyl or the oddness in the upper registers heard on SACD. If something has "Vinyl" in the title it's a needledrop. Claus , Feb 11, 2015 So, my completely subjective vote will go for DVD-A (or SACD). I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. I'm generally rather selective about my SACD purchases and only have about 25-30SACD recordings now although I plan to order a lot more as more and more reissues come out. Whether you are just getting started building a classical music collection, or a seasoned collector, there are many ways in which to enjoy the music. CCR SACD vs new vinyl. Unfortunately, the vinyl and CDs were impressive but not immersive. Oh yeah, Aimee Mann and Vanessa Fernandez too, that would be the newest. At all. The question of whether SACD sounds better is subjective and nuanced. I like both; but am buying more hi-q vinyl than SACD, DVD-A, or HDCD simply because remastered 180g vinyl is easier to find in the genres I listen to: Rock, alt-rock, blues, some jazz, and oldies. . Standard CDs still constitute over 94% of the market, cassettes about 5%, and vinyl LPs easily outselling both new high resolution format discs during the first half of this year 661,000 sold versus only 92,000!. This release was originally announced in late 2019 and fans have been waiting patiently ever since. Packaging: Nicest packaging and faithful reproduction of the original album. SACD vs. I don't know which is more truthful. We do plan on releasing a limited run of virgin vinyl 45rpm pressings—probably 500 pieces—sometime next month if we’re able. Oh and if you like SACDs, most of the masters were made on digital audio workstations that are PCM. The answer to that question is a qualified yes. . 10/disc royalty for CDs. The dynamics of the attack are still there, but the leading edge lacks aggressiveness and sounds much smoother. SACD vs. SACD vs. Boy, what a difference. 1 setup. KevinP, May 21, 2009 #52. This is the average EQ of the first track, Tears of Rage. The SHM-SACD is still a good option because it doesn't have CSG processing. Analog sources- CD vs. the interesting part for me was the number of copies for this set. ? I jumped into the SACD thing because I wanted agood digital source for my CDs so I said why not pay some more and get SACD. Miles Davis – Kind of Blue SACD – (out of print) – While this all time classic is available on all kinds of vinyl – you will have to make it your audiophile mission to find a used copy on SACD because it was released and it was good. Would someone out there who has the vinyl and has compared it to either the MFSL CD or the newer SACD please. Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by rpd, Dec 11, 2003. Virtual Systems Let the world see what you've built. . Rolling Stone 500 Greatest Albums of All Time — rated 30/500! " Are You Experienced appeared in the U. Boy, what a difference. Vinyl. DANKOSKY: We'll be talking a bit about some of these new, modern ways of compressing music. Vinyl- whoa. The SACD I found is always better, that’s if you have the right SACD player like the DMP. Music41 said: ↑. Compared to the vinyl, more rounded, less real. I have to say that after a couple of years of critical listening, I like SACD better. If. A vinyl record that is even slightly warped, or has a hole that is not perfectly centered, will have “wow”—slow variations in pitch. It’s appalling the crap they’re releasing to kids these days…As noted in my previous post [link], the Forum didn’t want to pay the $. The RCA CD of Respighi’s Pines of Rome opens with a wall of sound plastered along the frontal plane of the speakers. But I do own the original US CD and '93 remaster, along with the vinyl which is a skip-fest sadly. 1. General observations: * The Who - SHM-SACD is quite clean - I can easily move in and out of each track within each song so there is vg clarity. Audiogon The world's largest high-end audio community. If the SACD editions of The Police's albums were mastered from the original first-generation master tapes then they might sound better than the vinyl editions, as the original LPs were more than likely mastered from LP master tapes. It is a high-resolution digital. e. Quote: Originally Posted by daltonlanny CD's actually have a better signal to noise ratio in the top octave, and better dynamic range in the upper octave than SACD's do. Also, instead of a 16-bit depth, it uses a 1-bit depth. The sound of the two versions is similar. I’ve already evaluated Grundman’s mastering of Can’t Buy a Thrill in a Mini-TBVO on my blog, and I plan to evaluate every AP remaster as part of a mini or full. 4) Making Movies - muted, no drum slam, muted highs. Then I bought the new SACD version. The 2003 hybrid SACD and the MFSL feature the original mix, but they have inferior sound to the JWH tracks which appear on the 1997 Biograph remaster and the 1999 GHII remaster. But, Keith's drumming track seems lack lustre and 'dull', imo. But when I compare the same piece issued both on SACD and vinyl (Channel Records, Pentatone), SACD carries the day by a whisker: a touch airier, a slightly truer tone and yes, an even better “flow” that facilitate following the musical argument. Also, at the very end of the song, you notice some more dramatic quiet spots on the CD, where the SACD seems to be "filled in" a bit more. NorthNY Mark and Espen R like this. Japanese Import. Dylan 'Desire' MFSL SACD and vinyl* Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by Jack White, Aug 2, 2013. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. These are the CDs that remastering was able to improve. Digital vs. The quantization noise floor for 16-bit digital audio (the CD standard) is -96 dB, each bit yielding 6 dB of headroom between the noise floor and the ceiling. SACD vs. I listened to them a few times each over a period of a year. I personally wouldn't get either. Thankfully my vinyl copy of that album is pristine. One is the MFSL version which I loved. The Super Audio Compact Disc format was. Inner ear, May 11, 2017 #5. SACD vs. SACD's can tend to have better mastering and transfer than standard CD releases of the same album. I own the SHM-SACD of Who's Next along with CD's mastered by Doug Sax & our host. in May of 1967, one week before Sgt. Deeper fuller sound across the board. onlyconnect, Sep 19, 2020. I’ll explain in a minute, but first I want to make sure we know what the SACD format is, and what makes it different from a standard compact disc. Discussion in 'Audio Hardware' started by Litejazz53, Jul 13, 2019. " For classical I prefer SACD due to the format's running time though. If you like SACDs, the 2004 reissue of Relaxin’ by the Miles Davis Quintet sounds equally fantastic, albeit a little different with a brighter high end and more noticeable amounts of tape hiss. Quick links. Im just wondering when? Menu. "No matter how high a sampling rate is," Wired's. SACD vs. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. SACD offers pristine, high-resolution digital audio with exceptional detail, while vinyl provides a warm, analog character and a tactile, nostalgic experience. Stereophile SACD test Hi everybody, I've just joined this forum after reading this thread on the Stereophile test. There is some technology that JVC uses to make the. Much better sense of the recording environment, echos. SACD Players SACD stands for Super Audio CD. . To address a few questions; there are two seperate series, stereo and Mono in the Prestige SACD series, each with unique titles. Please login or register an accountlogin or register an accountThere was a comparison of this sacd against a vinyl record (first printing). I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. If the system is highly resolving there is a considerable and sometimes overwhelming difference. In-Stock Music Orders Over $99 SHIP FREE Within The Continental U. . The Rhino and Audio Fidelity releases are the same mix, but different masterings. Shawn, Dec 8, 2012. It has long been believed that the human ear cannot hear frequencies above 22 kHz. 11-16-2011 at 02:28pm. Would someone out there who has the vinyl and has compared it to either the MFSL CD or the newer SACD please. I'm hoping that everyone who has voted actually owns both, and are not just excited about the 2016. vinyl, I don't have vinyl so can't really tell. Los Angeles, CA. Also, instead of a 16-bit depth, it uses a 1-bit depth. I am a big vinyl fan, but have a small library of SACD's. The SACD is definitely much more forward and vivid across the board, with ringing steel strings and a real bite to the violin. I do have two different versions of "Question of Balance". 1 layer is very good, but the SACD layer has smoother high frequencies (violins, oboe) and better transient attack (tympani). Vinyl. Forums. The world's largest online retailer of high-end audio, audiophile music, and accessories. • 180 Gram Vinyl Record. Vinyl. . Audiogon The world's largest high-end audio community. You can hear what inspired Hendrix - he obviously didn’t stumble on the stereo mix of 'Watchtower' first. On the vinyl, the violin and the acoustic rhythm guitar lay back a bit, and there's a slightly rounded-off, woody tone to the drumming and the bass, and a very, very subtle tunneled, recessed quality to the vocals. The MoFi vinyl is a real eye-opener. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. 15 on its list of the 20 Greatest Duos of All Time. One is the MFSL version which I loved. Quick links. In my opinion Vinyl, SACD and DVD-A are all of sufficiently high resolution that, assuming comparitive quality playback and media, the recording and transfer / mastering is going to be making the differences between which will deliver superior sound quality. . Location: United States. Boy, what a difference. On the Analogue Productions SACD,. Would someone out there who has the vinyl and has compared it to either the MFSL CD or the newer SACD please. View entire discussion. Sponsor NewsMini-meet Shootout: AKG K1000 vs. Posted August 3, 2011. It may still. I can't believe there's any real debate over MFSL SACD vs. It is now showing as ‘in stock’ on the Acoustic Sounds. Get the DCC Gold CD of the Platinum-SHM mastering. SACD has given me some great listening moments. I've heard people say that this album isn't recorded as well as the albums to come, and to that I disagree. Elton John Elton John (2004 Rocket SACD HR B0003607-36) All the Elton John SACD's sound incredible. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. 112 posts total. On the other hand, vinyl’s sound stage remains unbeaten, as the ClearAudio parallel arm. Hendersonville, Tennessee Home of Cash & Orbison. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. Now, don't shoot me, but, I think my CCR SACD's are some of the worst sounding SACD's I have heard. CD, SACD vs LP, Vinyl, Album#CD #vinyl #hifiFor those of you who have not seen my complete music room and system tour and LP, CD SACD tour please click on th. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. The string attack, decay, soundstage, and imaging are way ahead of the SACD. KeithH Success With Honor. CD has a tint. Location: Panama. Bluebook The right price. Many audiophiles choose to embrace both formats, recognizing that each. . The fact that the DSD pulse train VISUALLY happens to look more like the analog signal than the string of binary numbers that result from PCM encoding is meaningless - since both must be converted to analog audio anyway. Fourth - 45 rpm vinyl . (Not Eligible for Additional Discount) $35. Might as well jump: Mobile Fidelity Sound Lab has announced that Van Halen's first six multi-platinum albums originally released on the Warner Bros. I don't know which is more truthful. Virtual Systems Let the world see what you've built. I don’t care what they claim they did to the CD. I don't know which is more truthful. all on Hybrid Multichannel SACD, in a special edition box set limited to 2,500 numbered copies! Also available as 45 RPM double LPs in a box set. : AREP 517787. I no longer have the capability of playing vinyl. Both formats offer unique qualities that appeal to discerning music enthusiasts, and the choice between them often comes down to personal preference and the pursuit of sonic perfection. SACD (white) vs Bluray (blue) The pressing quality of 2022 vinyl is not always perfect, but often a wash will solve the problem. Quote: Originally Posted by regal The sampling rate 44. Like the DVD, SACD was a dual-layer format, but instead of one or two high-density layers, the SACD could have a high-density layer and a CD-compatible layer, so the. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. As a college student, he played in indie bands, created his own LPs, cassettes, and t-shirts, and sold them at shows. Sounded most balanced, less bright, more "analog". Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. Some vinyl is very quiet while others are not . The real advantage of a (multichannel) SACD player is the ability to listen to the surround sound recording. Hi commsysman. Vinyl can sound utterly amazing at first but eventually you will wear out a record. 8224 MHz (64 times that of CD) Bit Depth: 1-bit (compared to CD’s 16-bit) Channels: Multi-channel (up to 6) and stereo Storage Capacity: Typically 4. There are very few times I like the CD better than the LP. Seems like for PG3 one should definitely get Classic Records Vinyl, for PG1 SACD gets closer to vinyl, but still the vinyl has upper hand. Even as a purist I am very happy with the results. For vinyl I currently have the 2009 Classic 200g, I think mastered by Grundman. Vinyl. DVD-Audio vs. If it's a choice between vinyl and SACD in headphones, then most people with any sort of budget will almost certainly pick SACD. Vinyl. Once you listen to the unbelievable sound of the grandfather clock chiming you. SACD vs. Wave 8 Primary equipment used: AKG K1000/ASL AQ-1005 DT/ASL Wave 8/Marantz SA8260 SACD player Stax Classic System II/Music Hall MMF-5 Turntable/Creek OBH-8 (This thread is multiple forum-spanning, I just chose. Multi. The vinyl appears to be analogue mastered so if you value an all-analogue chain that would be an advantage. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. - John SunierMoody Blues "Question of bal. Two channel SACD just blew away the CD's, while hybrids were not out yet I had albums that I had both the CD and the SACD to compare. Show Printable Version; 12-12-2012, 03:54 AM #31. The latest in this long history is a double-blind test that, the authors conclude, demonstrates that 44. On the other hand, at least to my ears, the bass lines are noticeably subdued on the 2012 SACD compared with the 2002 redbook CD. New media New comments Browse Albums Search media. Then I bought the new SACD version. It sounds like MoFi master their vinyl and SACD separately. SACD. 4) Making Movies - muted, no drum slam, muted highs. 1447) Join Date Dec 2011 Location Tynemouth, England Posts 2,457 Mentioned 43 Post(s)SACD vs. Also, do you think SACD has good future in the massive market? I also posted this thread in the "digital" seecion, sorry about that but some people only enter to this section. You can’t go wrong there. I don't know which is more truthful. Consequently, the Super Audio CD (SACD) was developed by Philips and Sony. Vinyl. Music, Musicians and Bands; Activity. It sounds manipulated and phony. I only have a single SHM-SACD - it’s superior compared to every format I’ve heard the title on, including the MoFI SACD. " Arrival Date To Be Announced " for the others. DSD uses delta-sigma modulation a form of pulse-density modulation encoding, a technique to represent audio signals in digital format, a sequence of single-bit values at a sampling rate of 2. Home. . As to the two selections, one is the Bob James Trio – “Espresso ” and the second is chlara. K. Bluntness acknowledged as you being quite passionate, or convinced that the 20th anniversary SACD version is poor at best It was actually the first SACD I bought many years ago, even without owning an SACD capable player at the time. Great sounding discs are much, much more frequent than on redbook, and it comes with none of the hassles of vinyl attached, plus you can rip the redbook layer and take it. New posts Search forums. It came as a total shock to me, since I heard so many people claim that SACD is mostly an overkill for the human ear. Have GFTO on SACD and the Yes 1968 - 1987 Studio Boxset on CD. The vinyl has a noise rise and a peak around 30 kHz. I've heard to the contrary, that the QUAD version. The latest in this long history is a double-blind test that, the authors conclude, demonstrates that 44. Also, I know that SACD didn't really catch on, but I see. I did a similar shoot out to yours above with the sax and vocal section at the end of Avalon with the SACD and UK first press vinyl. Most noticeable is a good front-to-back soundstage and to a lesser extent better timbre. At least they aren’t loudified. SACD disc and the DSD encoding (on a SACD) are a "frozen in time" tech circa 2005. I like Analogue Productions' work, so it should be interesting to hear how they sound. 0:39 - Stereo SACD Layer3. SACD can get really close to how good vinyl can sound but not deteriorate so for me SACD wins. 1kHz/16-bit digital audio is indistinguishable from high-resolution digital. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. It also provides a higher bit rate and longer. I don't know which is more truthful. Availability: In Stock. So far my favorites from each format are as follows: SACD: Eric Clapton - Journeyman DVD-A: Fleetwood Mac - Rumors DVD (Dolby Digital/DTS): Eagles. Thread Status: Not open for further replies. Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by swinger, Mar 2, 2004. Merch Rep the community and hobby you love so much. Although this recording was digital, the Parsons 2017 remaster actually sounds more analogue than the original cd. Quick links. vinyl, I'm surprised no one has brought up the concept of DSD's "euphoric distortion" and how that might relate to the perception of increased sound quality. . DJM first pressing vinyl from the UK best of all media. Whether is was done 15-20-30 years ago or today. vinyl debate ultimately comes down to personal preference and the listening experience you seek. When it comes to the debate of cardioid vs super cardioid for live. SACD, to me, just doesn't sound real, life-like, or true. but for every song, the DR value is "one less" on the SACD vs CD. I no longer have the capability of playing vinyl. Fourth - 45 rpm vinyl . In. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. SACD tend to be level adjusted a bit higher than other formats,so will sound more impressive on a A/B comparison. In other forum in Madrid we have carried out the test with the Stereophile material and I'm anxious to know if yo have done the same overhere and what results you have obtained. For many multi-channel enthusiasts the answer is yes, because that is what they care about most.