Titans are commonly artillery ships, so they have an energy+kinetic combo that works well with artillery battleships, but artillery ships suffer from minimal range and get rekt by torpedos. In the early game? I just messed up my Inward Perfection Ironman game because I upgraded my missile fleet to Autocannons. Welcome to Stellaris! You can find all the load outs of fallen empire ships. I separated them in pairs. 5. Now kinetic weapons look much more attractive and the only big point in favor of energy weapons is the higher. Certain buildings and other sources. For an overall practical design I fit Corvettes with one Energy mount and two kinetics. In my 22 hours I've only. Traits. All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos Workshop News Guides Reviews. In my 22 hours I've only. (2) attacker with long range kinetic (1) hunter with long range kinetic. Orbital Energy Conversion: tech_mining_terminal: Mining Guilds: tech_zero_gravity_assembly_sequence:. AI because they never spec Point Defense. Shields stop energy weapons, armor stops projectiles, point defense stops missiles. Unless you have the pops to work the jobs a building or district produces, it's worse than useless. IMHO the much better way is to stick with explosive + strike craft. AI because they never spec Point Defense. However, it looks like that at some point between then and now weapons were changed considerably. Content is available under Attribution-ShareAlike 3. In the early game? I just messed up my Inward Perfection Ironman game because I upgraded my missile fleet to Autocannons. I'm surprised that I haven't seen a big thread on this already, but it should be discussed. In my 22 hours I've only. View this video if you want to lea. The Sentinel Point Defense does 1-4 damage vs Flak Battery's 1-3, so I'm inclined to pick the energy PD over the kinetic PD. The only exception is when you’re countering something specific. Early game there are distinct performance differences between kinetics, energy and missile weapons leading to doctrines raised around employing weaponry of. My first game I went with Kinetic weapons and am now about 22 hours into the campaign and up to Railguns IV. Penetration is an important part of the metagame, especially around the T2 tech level, but it's an RPS balancing act like kinetic vs energy and PD vs. Shields provides an anti-energy layer of protection, based on the type of Shield component added, and tech bonuses. In my 22 hours I've only. Costs 480 Engineering, Requires Mineral Processing. 29. In the original release version of the game I reliably went with energy weapons and was happy with the results. Place the shield debuff defence platform right next to your spaceports, and then place the snare one right outside the red bubble. Then w1 does 3. Graey • 7 yr. 25), or Energy and Consumer Goods (1= 0. Armor provides an anti-kinetic layer of protection, based on the type of Armor component added, and tech bonuses. Received widsom is yes, you should take Mass Drivers or Lasers. Stellaris Ship Design Guide 2023 [3. Energy weapons also have a "special" kinds of weapons (Disruptors and Arc Emitters) that ignore both shields and armor, all damage goes directly to the hull but the overall damage can be pretty low. Like now missiles really suck so barely anybody uses them. If you don't have those, go for max armor and crystal forged hull. hull and a bonus vs. 50, vs Gamma lasers at 6. Having fleet will stop them from declaring war at all. Kinetic energy is not a vector. It might not kill them outright, but it will take a lot of their shields/armour, and may even damage them - making them less combat effective. Costs 600 Engineering, Requires Nanocomposite. If the enemy has a lot of shields, go for kinetic. Now kinetic weapons look much more attractive and the only big point in favor of energy weapons is the higher. Both energy and kinetic point defence target all the same targets (torpedos, strikecraft and missiles). 99 DPS. Best. Large broadside battleship. Both have its pros and cons. Energy Siphons are potent early game weapons. 9 Meta Update] We are all aware that Stellaris ship design has had a massive rebalance, and with that the combat system and the overall pace of the game. AI because they never spec Point Defense. . Out of all the Stellaris ships they are the ones that excel the most at point defense and their best use is protecting Battleships. I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. Generally speaking you also want to choose either kinetic, missile or. Kinetic weapons (Gauss Cannons) are good against. Optimised ships are able to strip shields and can boil hull and armour so using lasers and kinetics is very viable. . 25. The tachyon lance does 15. The tachyon has 90% armor pen, and -33% shield damage. I haven't played in almost a year. Basically there's 2 options - trade and generators. The kinetic energy formula defines the relationship between the mass of an object and its velocity. Legacy Wikis. My knowledge about it only goes about laser, it is very effective against armor and to guard. Since the ship tipe have been change i always had this idea in my mind, that the kinetic weapons should have a malus damage on armor like energy weapons have it on shield. I also have no use for the energy repeatables because I'm going trade federation and getting my energy from trade instead of an energy planet. A lot of armor, go energy. 9] This mod aims to increase the individuality of empires while maintaining the highest possible level of compatibility with other mods and without changing how weapons work. 16 DPS. Another viable reason for dropping Destroyers is going for Star Fortress in order to unlock Voidborne. - Wave Motion Gun - Powerful yamato superweapon that can 1 shot a battleship or even a titan but takes time to fire up and cooldown. Kinetic Artillery is the best Large kinetic weapon period. However, it looks like that at some point between then and now weapons were changed considerably. . Core Cracking. Quick reference: Defenses are good against what they are: physical defense vs physical weapons, energy defense vs energy weapons. Say I want to have a titan assigned to every fleet. Then again, Kinetic weapons wreck shields better than Disruptors, and larger varients also bypass armour. this is why. 1K 48K views 1 year ago Which is the. 5 for the armor, so 1. Point Defense does more damage per shot - its better at actually destroying incoming attackers because it kills them in less hits, giving them less of an opportunity to damage your fleet - if it hits, which is the critical distinction. Sending in a Demolitions Team using an Army. I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. Point Defense does more damage per shot - its better at actually destroying incoming attackers because it kills them in less hits, giving them less of an opportunity to damage your fleet - if it hits, which is the critical distinction. You need Flak and Kinetic Artillery and they sit along the kinetic tree. In my 22 hours I've only. I built my fleet to counter the enemy's (they had only missiles) by giving my ships Point Defense and Kinetic weapons to counter their shields. Kinetic weapons are good because they keep shooting down regenerating shields so that the energy weapons can keep destroying the armor it is good against so both can ultimately attack the hull they are decent against, so for kinetics to be good you need weapons that have a bonus against armor and or hull to use the shields getting shot down. It usually isn't ignored by weapons. AI because they never spec Point Defense. My first game I went with Kinetic weapons and am now about 22 hours into the campaign and up to Railguns IV. In the original release version of the game I reliably went with energy weapons and was happy with the results. Ceramo Metal Materials. Because i tink that the kinetic wepons right now give an advantage in combat. I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. Energy & Armies – Three players involved. that is a 325% difference in base DPS before adjusting for modifiers. also, Armor is cool. yea i mean the fallen empires rely heavily on them. Subscribe to download. In the 3. 7k and the Kinetic Battleships had a fleet power of 88. So in my opinion the giga canon is really the way to go. Age of Wonders 4 Empire of Sin Cities: Skylines 2 Crusader Kings 3 Europa Universalis 4 Hearts of Iron 4 Hunter: The Reckoning Imperator: Rome Prison Architect Stellaris Surviving Mars Surviving the Aftermath Vampire: The Masquerade Victoria 3. ago. 9] This mod aims to increase the individuality of empires while maintaining the highest possible level of compatibility with other mods and without changing how weapons work. Darsol • 7 yr. But that is only even taking into account the enemy damage types. I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. Costs 480 Engineering, Requires Mineral Processing. However, it looks like that at some point between then and now weapons were changed considerably. I mean if you look at the missiles you know you can shoot them down whit point defense, energy. Members Online • [deleted]. Signature Weapons [3. Be aware this is a work in progress. The fleet power remaining was an average of 43,980 and the average number of ships remaining was 17. AI because they never spec Point Defense. I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. The icon makes them look like artillery, but I take them to be a scaled-up multi-projectile railgun. Flak does less damage per shot, in contrast, but is. Subscribe to download. Because i tink that the kinetic wepons right now give an advantage in combat. However, it looks like that at some point between then and now weapons were changed considerably. In the original release version of the game I reliably went with energy weapons and was happy with the results. It is easier for weapons to ignore, but also easier to bulk up. These were originally planned as energy only but during play we found out that with a few more perks they make awesome armies as well! This is the only species that really “needs” to be psionic and cybernetic. In the late game I just go with energy weapons (mostly focused arc emitters and neutron launchers) and strike craft. PD starts with 10 Tracking and ends with 30. Now kinetic weapons look much more attractive and the only big point in favor of energy weapons is the higher. Kinetics tend to have worse accuracy than the equivalent Laser weapon. It was a long-awaited change since the meta seemed to be amassing Battleships with Neutron Launcers and going through the game mindlessly. JVendin • 6 yr. AI because they never spec Point Defense. Disruptors and other piercing weapons, since the Contingency has strong shields and armor but poor hull. Battleship - Full X and L weapons. you can dump your excess trade into CG/Unity, whereas generators don't rely on your trade protection. Conversely, they aren’t very good against enemy armor. Ditch the Tachyon lance unless you're going up against Prethoryn. After work has been done, energy has been transferred to the object, and the object will be moving with a new constant speed. The advantage of the kinetic artillery, which i think is the prime advanatage of all kinetics, is that they're a lower energy cost. Still need a minimum amount of Energy regardless, for the Hull damage. I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. Unlike their weapons, FEs always use an even mix of T5 armor and T6 shields, so you should use an even mix of kinetic and energy weapons (perhaps with a slight bias towards kinetics). An empire can build Resource Silos buildings on colonies and Resource Silo buildings on starbases to expand their storage capacity. Armor provides an anti-kinetic layer of protection, based on the type of Armor component added, and tech bonuses. Plasma Auto. The Low roll damage for a Lance is an Average roll for. Now I know about the Battleship / Kinetic Artillery and Plasma Cruiser Meta. 54, 29. My first game I went with Kinetic weapons and am now about 22 hours into the campaign and up to Railguns IV. Which is the better weapon to place in our large slots? Should we use neutron launchers? how about cloud lightning? Is the secret really to use kinetic artil. Huh, TIL. 13. What are the broad pros/cons between using a regular weapon (energy/kinetic) vs. ago. Ditch the Tachyon lance unless you're going up against Prethoryn. For standard battles, it’s tough to beat the reliability and versatility of the simple plasma accelerator, complete with high damage and low energy cost. Since lasers are a bit on the Elvish side of things, I thought I'll try to avoid them and play only with kinetic weapons and missiles/torpedoes. Neutron Battleship Analysis: Win percentage = 100%. As the title says. Their destroyers have an ungodly amount of PD, but their battleships don't have any at all, meaning that missiles and strike craft are usually a bad idea. Now kinetic weapons look much more attractive and the only big point in favor of energy weapons is the higher. Myself i generally just make my fleets balanced, with kinetic and energy weapons, favoring kinetic for large guns, energy for xl size and balanced medium and small, but for min maxing you could check the loadout of your upcoming enemy and building to counter them if they favor shields or armor. Also, get lots of shields since the Contingency's weapons suck vs shields. AI because they never spec Point Defense. PD is slightly harder hitting, Flak can reach a higher Tracking. There are a few things to do. I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. 27. Battleships are very vulnerable to torpedoes now, and all spinal mount and artillery weapons got nerfed pretty hard so their damage output isn't quite as overwhelming compared with other ship-types anymore. I suppose the more corvettes/frigates you have containing auto cannons the better outcome you will have in the cq battle. . Both energy and kinetic point defence target all the same targets (torpedos, strikecraft and missiles). AI because they never spec Point Defense. In the original release version of the game I reliably went with energy weapons and was happy with the results. Titans. The sinews of war are infinire money. Now kinetic weapons look much more attractive and the only big point in favor of energy weapons is the higher. Both! Kinetic weapons have a bonus against Shields and malus against Armor, while Laser ones have the opposite. I believe the best fleet layout (not counting the wierd bugged 'naked corvettes swarm') involves a mix of Energy Torpedoes, Plasma and Kinetics. In my 22 hours I've only. If you have 5-6 fleets of those battleships and titans you can kill an unbidden fleet and the anchor with no losses. Large carrier cruiser. I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. Stellaris Mods Used: Extra Ship Components 3. Corvettes make up the backbone for much of the game and 2x Kinetic + 1x Laser or vice versa works pretty well. Missiles are good before everyone has shields; torpedos are best when everyone has shields, but before they all have point defense. AI because they never spec Point Defense. Edit: apparently not I don't think it's a great advantage, but I guess if you want to sacrifice a bit of destructive power for more defensibility, it's goodI haven't played in almost a year. /rival bonus. Received widsom is yes, you should take Mass Drivers or Lasers. . 1. The first choice you make in the for weapons in the game are the ones your starting with, And this decision should determine your play style to a higher degree then any other factor. 28s. Torpedo corvettes were meta some time ago, but were nerfed. Money (or in the case of Stellaris, Energy) is the blood flowing through the veins of your galactic empire. In my 22 hours I've only. Costs 600 Engineering, Requires Nanocomposite. 1 How to use the Tech Id Cheat? 2 Stellaris Tech Id List – A-B. Neutons in large. The Ether Drake guards the planet known as Dragon’s Hoard and is one of the guardian creatures of Stellaris. Accuracy is the standard/max to-hit of a weapon. The late game threats - Fallen Empires, Prethoryn, Unbidden, etc. This command adds the specified amount of energy credits to your energy credits amount. 99. I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. Giga cannons do not do the job like arc emitters and cloud lighting is too short. 4 trade value, 0. The focused arc emitter does 11. Our fleets were "Equivalent". ago. This energy can be released in a car engine when the gasoline combusts, producing high-temperature gases that move the engine’s pistons and, ultimately, propel the car forward (kinetic energy) 1 . But how about the. Since the ship tipe have been change i always had this idea in my mind, that the kinetic weapons should have a malus damage on armor like energy weapons have it on shield. The kinetic energy KE equation is as follows: KE = 0. Laser is fine as starting weapon, but it makes it a little harder to get the good kinetic stuff fast. I wanted to get tips from you guys about battleship design. Kinetic Weapons. Kinetics tend to have worse accuracy than the equivalent Laser weapon. But it also penetrates armor by 50%. Flak on the other hand starts at 50 Tracking and ends at 70. Kauldric Jul 30, 2022 @ 12:58pm. 24 , 24. It was a long-awaited change since the meta seemed to be amassing Battleships with Neutron Launcers and going through the game mindlessly. Also, get lots of shields since the Contingency's weapons suck vs shields. 6. Each pair was moved to Star System with no populated planets, spaceports, mining\science\battle\energy stations (because after "attackallfleet" command they will participate in battle - we don`t need this). . Energy weapons are better at defeating shields and or armor, but they have lower overall DPS for the most part than kinetic weapons (not talking about tachyon lances and the like). 13. I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. 1 torp, 1 disruptor corvette. However, it looks like that at some point between then and now weapons were changed considerably. ) are good against armor but bad against shields. Darsol • 7 yr. Accuracy is the standard/max to-hit of a weapon. 2 kinetic, 1 laser, 2 shield, 1 armour corvette. Mix these two in a ratio that matches enemy missiles. Planetary Automation will now take resources directly from an Empire’s resources, and we have added the ability to forbid using specific resources. Lasers: a good early-game weapon before you get to the Proton Launcher, but goes obsolete once you reach that tech level. I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. tech_kinetic_artillery_1: Kinetic Battery: tech_kinetic_artillery_2: Kinetic Artillery. 6k hp and battleships around 7k hp, lower raw damage is going to hurt. An empire can build Resource Silos buildings on colonies and Resource Silo buildings on starbases to expand their storage capacity. I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. I haven't played in almost a year. I would use Kinetic normal stuff until I can build Kinetic Artillery and that is the bread & butter of the fleet. It lacks the bonus to hull damage lasers have. If you're fighting other empires, I go with a mix of artillery battleships (pick your poison, energy or kinetic) and carrier battleships (because high evasion corvettes suck). It's totally backwards to me. Energy and Kinetic point defense systems, and they both cost the same in terms of power and alloys, and have the same cooldown, accuracy and range. Stellaris. In addition, when the Galactic. first damage out put and stack research for energy/ kinetic damage. Now I know about the Battleship / Kinetic Artillery and Plasma Cruiser Meta. I've been playing around with trade value and ecumenopolis a bit and I realize that producing energy via trade is much more convenient than doing it throught normal means: a generator district produces 8 base energy and employs 2 pops, while a basic commercial zone produces 10 trade value, 10 amenities and employs 5 people. This is what I have taken away from the information. 5 and 0. My fleet got obliterated and theirs barely took any damage, despite my ship designs hard countering theirs. I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. ago. In my 22 hours I've only. Now I know about the Battleship / Kinetic Artillery and Plasma Cruiser Meta. I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. Autobest will often spam things like disrupters which suck, and you won't be focusing your tech on just two or three damages, which will help you tech up faster. Even against level 1 and two starports mass drivers are slightly better, but it is a much narrower gap. AI because they never spec Point Defense. Part of the chemical energy is converted to the kinetic energy of the car, while part is converted to thermal energy as heat emitted from the. Subscribe to download. overall, the energy torpedoes are the better weapon in my opinion. Now I know about the Battleship / Kinetic Artillery and Plasma Cruiser Meta. In the original release version of the game I reliably went with energy weapons and was happy with the results. I like to use Kinetic for the initial long range engagement. But how about the. The mass driver statline just does more raw dps and it's bonuses are better suited to taking out other corvettes then lasers, as well as having a slight range edge. This allows you to bring up cheats like max_resources, instant_build, research_all_technologies. Since the ship tipe have been change i always had this idea in my mind, that the kinetic weapons should have a malus damage on armor like energy weapons have it on shield. None of these have anything to do with the kinetic tech tree so its not at all uncommon for me to be in like battleship/titan tech levels with only T1 mass drivers as my kinetic weapon :) Physics only have like power, energy buildings, sensors, combat computers and shields as high prio techs and you can put off both shields and energy. I just go with auto-complete for whatever roles I have the sections set for, and leave it at that. Both have the same Accuracy. Now I know about the Battleship / Kinetic Artillery and Plasma Cruiser Meta. First Choice. Secondly, Starbases are way more cost effective than fleets in the early game. But the Flak Battery has 50% tracking vs Sentinel's 10% tracking,. 1 Lem released, I can finally post this. So - kinetic for MP, mix of kinetic & energy for larger singleplayer maps. In same time energy weapon became only stronger in time - lasers are very mediocre, plasma is strongest anti-armor gun (and we need it to deal with AE and Leviathans) and tachyons are simply best X-sized weapon in game. Who is Kinetic for?. Early game there are distinct performance differences between kinetics, energy and missile weapons leading to doctrines raised around employing weaponry of different sizes and ranges. This is a bit of a problem given the way the tech curve works in the current balance, since plasma is only relevant for maybe a few decades, so there's little point in even teching into it at all. Not only would that've made sense with regard to the P. 2 Kinetic Artillery is 80 average damage per day vs the Saturator's 115, while the Saturator has a higher multiplier against both shields and armor. Title Card Overlay by Wi. However, it looks like that at some point between then and now weapons were changed considerably. Yours will have a 60-75% chance to hit, depending on tracking and accuracy and ect. Kinetic Batteries: best large kinetic weapon, like the kinetic version of Launchers Specialized Explosives: Torpedo, Swarm Torpedoes: slower, tankier, less accurate and shorter range compared to missiles but have a much higher damage output and does bonus damage against armour instead of hull; for use against heavier shipsAll resources can be stockpiled. I think my favorite early ship build is a Corvette with Point Defense, Energy Siphon, and Lasers. My first game I went with Kinetic weapons and am now about 22 hours into the campaign and up to Railguns IV. that is a 325% difference in base DPS before adjusting for modifiers. It usually isn't ignored by weapons. Now I know about the Battleship / Kinetic Artillery and Plasma Cruiser Meta. Kinetic weapons generally have slightly lower accuracy, higher damage and longer range compared to energy weapons, making them a good complement to. 401K subscribers in the Stellaris community. r/Stellaris. Don't listen to that troll, the best early game design is always 2 red lasers and a mass driver (because kinetic weapons are only needed to take down shields otherwise they are always inferior to energy weapons), use improved components as they are researched and go shield heavy as you can afford it because winning wars is all about. However, it looks like that at some point between then and now weapons were changed considerably. overall, the energy torpedoes are the better weapon in my opinion. I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. Armor- 12. My first game I went with Kinetic weapons and am now about 22 hours into the campaign and up to Railguns IV. AI because they never spec Point Defense. There are 5 designs that are "optimal". 2. In the original release version of the game I reliably went with energy weapons and was happy with the results. One for armor, and one for shields (2 pairs). What kind of weapons should space-bearing vessels use in Stellaris? A lot of games follow the trichotomy of mass drivers, missiles, and beam weapons. . This is something I've been observing more and more as I play. Now yes, it's Stellaris and we can just say "new meta - XL battleships with Carrier core and line computer ftw" and yes you can even design an artillery battleship that isn't awful (as long as you don't mix kinetic weapons with plasma due to the range differences) but when the best way to use a titan (which can't have a line computer). even on the autocannon's worst target it has 40% the effectiveness of plasma. I have the weird feelings that if I had pursued missile research instead of switching to kinetics, I would have easily won that war. Welp, those will be some very powerful, and expensive, defense platforms for that stage of the game. Titans are commonly artillery ships, so they have an energy+kinetic combo that works well with artillery battleships, but artillery ships suffer from minimal range and get rekt by torpedos. I have the weird feelings that if I had pursued missile research instead of switching to kinetics, I would have easily won that war. Because Trade is an inefficient resource, unless you pick up bonuses that make it better, and those bonuses require you to pick specific Species Traits, Traditions, etc. Generally, you want your spinal mount to be a kinetic weapon or an arc emitter since you take out shields before you take out armor. And if they have, armor is better than hull against kinetic batteries. Reply reply Firedashredragon • Strike craft is game of speed, the closer they are the better they hurt, but the ratio between the range and the survivability of the carrier and very important the enemy range. #3. You starting weapons should make up the backbone of your fleet throughout the entire game. I personally, have always liked shields. Its DPS is 4. #7. Ceramo Metal Materials. My first game I went with Kinetic weapons and am now about 22 hours into the campaign and up to Railguns IV. I have the weird feelings that if I had pursued missile research instead of switching to kinetics, I would have easily won that war. For corvettes, do it at a 1:1 ratio. My first game I went with Kinetic weapons and am now about 22 hours into the campaign and up to Railguns IV. One for armor, and one for shields (2 pairs). I haven't played in almost a year. 1 (played yesterday) funnily enough i had much better results with full on kinetic than arc emitters and empty, arc amitters and lightning and arc emitters and pd+hangar, despite heavily researching energy weapon repeatables and no kinetic ones, than with focused arc emitters. ago. 24 , 24. Because Trade is an inefficient resource, unless you pick up bonuses that make it better, and those bonuses require you to pick specific Species Traits, Traditions, etc. Once you get like 4 of each in a fleet, barely anything beats it. In the early game? I just messed up my Inward Perfection Ironman game because I upgraded my missile fleet to Autocannons. Large broadside battleship. When these ships are not packing armor, or shields, and destroyers have 1600 hp, cruisers 2. I stick to only energy and kinetic weapons, and don't even touch strike craft or missiles. I currently struggle to balance damage types, fleet speed and fleet ranges. Another key point to note: Energy torpedoes CANNOT be shot down by PD. List includes commands for all platforms (Windows, Mac, Linux) on Steam with help and examples. But the Flak Battery has 50% tracking vs Sentinel's 10% tracking,. When you hover over PD weapons, under "Type" they say "Point Defense, Kinetic". Like many of the other Guardians, the Infinity Machine should be beatable by any Fleet of at least 40k Power, however a smaller Fleet of well-designed ships will also be able to overcome it. If we want to accelerate an object, then we must apply a force. AI because they never spec Point Defense. However, it looks like that at some point between then and now weapons were changed considerably. However, it looks like that at some point between then and now weapons were changed considerably. #3. Another design that is effective against regular AI uses the arc emitter X slot and two bomber wings.